Sunday, 21 December 2025

Falling Film Evaporator (FFE) - Working Principle - Design - Scale-up

Hello Everyone....!! Hope you are doing good.

In our previous posts, we discussed various heat transfer equipment. Today, I want to dive deep into one of the most efficient pieces of equipment used in the Pharma and Chemical industries for concentration and solvent recovery: the Falling Film Evaporator (FFE).

Whether you are dealing with heat-sensitive APIs or looking for high-efficiency solvent recovery, understanding the FFE is crucial for any process engineer.

The Falling Film Evaporator is a sophisticated vertical shell-and-tube heat exchanger designed for high-efficiency evaporation, particularly under vacuum conditions. Unlike flooded evaporators where tubes are filled with liquid, the FFE operates by distributing the process fluid as a continuous, gravity-driven thin film—typically between 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm thick—along the inner walls of the tubes. The defining technical advantage here is the elimination of the hydrostatic head. In traditional evaporators, the weight of the liquid column increases the pressure at the bottom, which artificially raises the boiling point (boiling point elevation). In an FFE, since the liquid is only a thin film, the boiling happens at the exact saturation temperature corresponding to the vessel pressure. This allows the system to operate at very low temperature differences (dT), making it energy efficient and perfect for integration with Thermal or Mechanical Vapor Recompression (TVR/MVR) systems.

The key for a successful FFE operation lies in the Liquid Distribution System located at the top of the calandria. For the equipment to function, the liquid must be perfectly distributed to every single tube to ensure the entire inner surface is wetted. If the distribution is uneven, some tubes may receive too little liquid, leading to the formation of dry spots. These dry spots are a process engineer's nightmare; they cause localized overheating, which leads to product degradation, scaling, and eventual tube fouling. The flow regime within the film whether it is laminar, wavy-laminar, or turbulent—is determined by the Film Reynolds Number. It's important to note that maintaining a flow rate above the Minimum Wetting Rate is the primary safeguard against mechanical and process failure in these units.

From a thermal kinetic perspective, the FFE offers an exceptionally high heat transfer coefficient (U) because the thin film presents minimal resistance to heat flow. As the liquid descends, the heat from the shell side causes the solvent to flash into vapor. Interestingly, in most modern designs, the vapor and liquid travel co-currently (in the same direction) downwards. This high-velocity vapor core in the center of the tube actually helps push the liquid film against the walls, enhancing the heat transfer via shear stress. Because the liquid travels the length of the tube in a matter of seconds, the residence time is extremely low. This is the critical reason why FFE is the industry standard for concentrating heat-sensitive APIs, enzymes, and biological extracts that would otherwise decompose if held at high temperatures in a conventional batch reactor.

Before getting into the actual topic, lets have some Q & A's,

Why is it called a "Falling Film" evaporator? 

Because the liquid flows down the inner walls of the tubes as a thin film under the influence of gravity, rather than filling the tubes completely.


What is the main advantage of FFE over Rising Film Evaporators? 

FFE can handle highly heat-sensitive materials because it operates with a lower dT and does not require a "climb" against gravity, which reduces residence time.


What are "dry spots" and why are they dangerous? 

Dry spots occur when the liquid film breaks. This leads to local overheating, which can cause product degradation, scaling, or "coking" inside the tubes.


What is the "Minimum Wetting Rate"? 

It is the minimum liquid flow rate per unit perimeter of the tube (typically expressed in kg/m .s) required to maintain a continuous, unbroken film.


How does FFE handle vacuum operations? 

FFEs are ideal for vacuum because they have a very low pressure drop. This allows for boiling at significantly lower temperatures, protecting the product.


Why is the distribution plate considered the most critical component? 

If the plate is not level or the holes are clogged, the film will be uneven, leading to immediate loss of efficiency and potential equipment damage.


In which pharma processes is FFE commonly used? 

Concentration of product rich layers, recovery of solvents from API mother liquors, and handling biological products like insulin or proteins.


What is the typical film thickness in an FFE? 

The film is usually very thin, ranging from 0.5 mm to 2 mm, depending on the viscosity and flow rate.


Can FFE handle viscous liquids? 

It is effective up to moderate viscosities (approx. 200 cP). For extremely viscous or "thick" fluids, a Wiped Film Evaporator (WFE) is a better choice.


What is the role of the vapor separator at the bottom? 

Since the vapor and liquid exit the tubes together, the separator uses centrifugal force to pull the concentrated liquid to the bottom while the solvent vapor exits through the top.


What is the typical heat transfer coefficient (U) for FFE? 

It is generally high, ranging from 1500 to 3000 W/m2 .K for water-based systems, depending on the Reynolds number of the film.


Designing of Falling Film Evaporator

When designing an FFE, we start with the Mass and Energy Balance.



1. Mass Balance

If F is the Feed rate, P is the Product rate, and E is the Evaporation rate:

F = P + E

2. Energy Balance (Heat Load)

The heat required (Q) is the sum of the heat to raise the feed to boiling point plus the latent heat of vaporization (Ζ›):

Q = F . Cp (Tboiling - Tfeed) + E . Ζ›

3. Calculating Heat Transfer Area (A)

Using the heat transfer equation:

A = Q / (U x LMTD)

Where:

  • = Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient.

  • LMTD = Log Mean Temperature Difference between the heating media and the process fluid.

4. Determining Tube Count (N)

To ensure a stable film, we calculate the number of tubes based on the Wetting Rate (πšͺ):

πšͺ = F / (N x Ο€ x D)

Where D is the inner diameter of the tube. Usually, πšͺ should be maintained between 0.25 to 1.0 kg/m.s for water-like liquids.


Scale-up From Lab/Pilot to Commercial

Scaling up an FFE is not just about increasing the area; it is about maintaining the film dynamics.

The Rule of Thumb: When scaling up, you must keep the Wetting Rate (πšͺ) and the Tube Length constant or similar to maintain the same residence time and heat transfer characteristics.



Scale-up Example:

Suppose you have a pilot FFE with 10 tubes (1-inch diameter) processing 100 kg/hr of feed. You want to scale up to 500 kg/hr.

Step - 1:

Calculate Pilot Wetting Rate (πšͺ):

πšͺ = 100 / (10 x Ο€ x 0.0254) = 125 Kg/m. hr


Step - 2:

Calculate Commercial Tube Count (Nc)

To keep πšͺ the same for 500 kg/hr

Nc = 500 / (πšͺ x Ο€ x 0.0254) = 50 tubes

By keeping the tube diameter and length the same and simply increasing the number of tubes, you ensure that the heat transfer efficiency remains predictable.


That's it......!!

Hope you understood the concept of Falling Film Evaporator.

For any queries, please comment / reach us at pharmacalc823@gmail.com

Comments are most appreciated.......!!



A
bout The Author


Hi! I am Ajay Kumar Kalva, Currently serving as the CEO of this site, a tech geek by passion, and a chemical process engineer by profession, i'm interested in writing articles regarding technology, hacking and pharma technology.
Follow Me on Twitter AjaySpectator & Computer Innovations

Sunday, 2 November 2025

Estimation of Just Suspension Speed (Njd)

Hi Everyone ....!!

Hope you are doing good, its been a while since i post something. Today i want to post something very much required for chemical engineers who work in Pharmaceutical / Speciality chemicals / Agro chemical industries i.e., Just dispersion speed (Njd). 

In critical reactor operations like Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Washing, achieving complete and efficient mass transfer hinges entirely on proper mixing. The absolute minimum agitation speed required for this is the Just Dispersion Speed (Njd).

Njd is the critical minimum impeller speed (RPM) needed to ensure no segregated layer of the dispersed phase (the solvent, product, or impurity) remains separated at the top or bottom of the vessel. Operating below Njd guarantees incomplete mass transfer and a failed batch.


Lets quickly jump into the post, but before that lets have few Q&A's to make the walkthrough smooth.


Is Njd affected by the viscosity of the liquids?

Yes, significantly. The correlation above is best suited for low-to-medium viscosity fluids. For highly viscous systems, the power required to initiate flow increases dramatically, meaning the effective KLL* value is much higher, and more complex, viscosity-dependent correlations must be used.


What is the visual criterion for determining Njd experimentally?

Experimentally, NJD is the speed at which the interface between the two layers just vanishes. This is the point where the segregated layer of the dispersed phase (puddle at the bottom or pool at the top) is entirely entrained into the bulk of the continuous phase, leaving no continuous layer.


Why can't I simply operate at the highest possible RPM?

Running far above Njd risks over-emulsification by creating excessively fine, stable emulsions (very small droplets). While this maximizes mass transfer area, it drastically impedes the subsequent settling/phase separation step, which is crucial for product isolation. Optimal operation balances mass transfer with separation time.


Does Njd change if the ratio of the two phases changes?

Yes. The Njd generally decreases as the volume fraction of the dispersed phase (ΙΈ) increases. When the dispersed phase volume is larger, it becomes slightly easier to entrain and disperse, requiring less energy to overcome the surface/buoyancy forces. This factor is often addressed in the full, detailed Njd correlations by including a ΙΈ term.


Lets get into the case study,

The Science of Njd: Overcoming Gravity and Buoyancy

The determination of Njd is a problem of balancing forces: the Inertial Forces (from the agitator) must be just strong enough to overcome the Gravitational/Buoyancy Forces (from the density difference) to circulate and disperse the entire second phase.

The Practical Correlation for Njd

For practical industrial mixing, where the goal is often low-shear flow and circulation for large volumes, a modified empirical correlation is frequently employed, which reflects the heavy dependence on impeller size and density difference:

Njd = KLL x (g x d⍴/⍴c)^0.5 x (1/d),

ParameterUnit (SI)Definition
NjdRPSJust Dispersion Speed
KLL(Dimensionless)Impeller & Geometry Constant
gm/s^2Gravitational Acceleration (approx. 9.81m/s^2
dkg/m^3Absolute Density Difference
⍴ckg/m^3Density of the Continuous Phase
dmImpeller Diameter

KLL Constants for Common Pharma Agitators

The Impeller Constant KLL is crucial and depends heavily on the impeller type and D/T ratio.

Agitator Type (Common Pharma Use)Typical Flow PatternKLL​ Range (Approx.)
Pitched Blade Turbine (PBT, 45°)Axial (Flow/Circulation)0.40 - 0.70
Hydrofoil Impeller (e.g., A310)High Efficiency Axial0.30 - 0.50
Rushton Turbine (RT)Radial (High Shear)0.80 - 1.20
PropellerAxial (Low Viscosity)0.35 - 0.55
Anchor ImpellerCircumferential (High Viscosity/Heat Transfer)0.20 - 0.40

Case Study: Calculating a Practical Njd

We determine the Njd for a purification step involving a denser aqueous product solution and a lighter organic wash solvent using a flow-dominant impeller.

1. System Parameters

PropertyContinuous Phase (Aqueous)Dispersed Phase (Organic)
Density () ⍴c= 1100 kg/m^3d = 850 kg/m^3
Impeller TypePitched Blade Turbine (PBT)
Impeller Diameterd = 0.50 m
Gravitational Accel.g = 9.81 m/s^2
2.  Calculation Inputs

  • Density Difference (d): 1100 kg/m^3 - 850 kg/m^3 = 250 kg/m^3

  • Impeller Constant (KLL): Using the conservative PBT range, we select KLL = 0.5.

3. Applying the Njd Formula

Njd = 0.5 x (9.81 x 250 / 1100)^0.5 x (1/0.5) = 1.49 RPS = 89 RPM

Inference:
For a production reactor, the minimum speed required is approximately 90 RPM. To ensure efficient mass transfer and account for potential batch variability, the Operating Agitator Speed (Nop) would typically be set 20% to 50% above Njd (e.g., 110 RPM to 135 RPM).

Hope this is clear for everyone.

If any queries, feel free to write us at pharmacalc823@gmail.com

Comments are most appreciated .......!!




PollMaker A
bout The Author


Hi! I am Ajay Kumar Kalva, Currently serving as the CEO of this site, a tech geek by passion, and a chemical process engineer by profession, i'm interested in writing articles regarding technology, hacking and pharma technology.
Follow Me on Twitter AjaySpectator & Computer Innovations